Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement
Following Zoller, Akar and Donohue there has been much debate about the possibility of claiming damages for breach of a JA under the common law system. The debate has also been extended to the question of whether a claim on damages may be an alternative under the framework of Brussels Regulations I,...
Autor Principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Trabajo de grado (Bachelor Thesis) |
Lenguaje: | Desconocido (Unknown) |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://babel.banrepcultural.org/cdm/ref/collection/p17054coll23/id/429 |
id |
ir-p17054coll23-429 |
---|---|
recordtype |
dspace |
spelling |
ir-p17054coll23-4292020-09-29 Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement Moreno Prieto, Natalia Following Zoller, Akar and Donohue there has been much debate about the possibility of claiming damages for breach of a JA under the common law system. The debate has also been extended to the question of whether a claim on damages may be an alternative under the framework of Brussels Regulations I, particularly in the present context where the European Court of Justice has expressly precluded the use of traditional common law tools to enforce JAs. In this essay I intent to identify, from the existing common law cases, what conditions are required to ground a claim on damages for breach of a JA and if such claim would be compatible with the Brussels Regulation I. For this purpose I will also consider the work of different authors in the subject. However Briggs’ work will be central to my study as it is one of the most complete works on damages for breach of JAs. I will also briefly examine if the reforms introduced by the Re-Cast EC1215/2012 change the conclusion reached in respect of the current Brussels Regulation I. Acuerdos de Jurisdicción; Agreeements on Jurisdiction; Akar case; Brussels Regulations; Cláusulas Jurisdiccionales; Derecho Privado Internacional; Donohue case; International Commercial Litigation; Jurisdicción en la Unión Europea; Jurisdiction on European Union; Litigio Comercial Internacional; Private International Law; Regulación (EC) 1215/2001; Regulación (EC) 44/2001; Regulation (EC) 1215/2012; Regulation (EC) 44/2001; West Tankers case; Zoller case Ciencias sociales; Ciencias sociales / Derecho 2015 PDF Tesis ENG - Inglés Unión Europea Colfuturo © Derechos reservados del autor http://babel.banrepcultural.org/cdm/ref/collection/p17054coll23/id/429 |
institution |
Biblioteca Virtual Banco de la República - Colecciones digitales |
collection |
Custom |
language |
Desconocido (Unknown) |
topic |
Acuerdos de Jurisdicción; Agreeements on Jurisdiction; Akar case; Brussels Regulations; Cláusulas Jurisdiccionales; Derecho Privado Internacional; Donohue case; International Commercial Litigation; Jurisdicción en la Unión Europea; Jurisdiction on European Union; Litigio Comercial Internacional; Private International Law; Regulación (EC) 1215/2001; Regulación (EC) 44/2001; Regulation (EC) 1215/2012; Regulation (EC) 44/2001; West Tankers case; Zoller case Ciencias sociales; Ciencias sociales / Derecho |
spellingShingle |
Acuerdos de Jurisdicción; Agreeements on Jurisdiction; Akar case; Brussels Regulations; Cláusulas Jurisdiccionales; Derecho Privado Internacional; Donohue case; International Commercial Litigation; Jurisdicción en la Unión Europea; Jurisdiction on European Union; Litigio Comercial Internacional; Private International Law; Regulación (EC) 1215/2001; Regulación (EC) 44/2001; Regulation (EC) 1215/2012; Regulation (EC) 44/2001; West Tankers case; Zoller case Ciencias sociales; Ciencias sociales / Derecho Moreno Prieto, Natalia Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement |
description |
Following Zoller, Akar and Donohue there has been much debate about the possibility of claiming damages for breach of a JA under the common law system. The debate has also been extended to the question of whether a claim on damages may be an alternative under the framework of Brussels Regulations I, particularly in the present context where the European Court of Justice has expressly precluded the use of traditional common law tools to enforce JAs.
In this essay I intent to identify, from the existing common law cases, what conditions are required to ground a claim on damages for breach of a JA and if such claim would be compatible with the Brussels Regulation I. For this purpose I will also consider the work of different authors in the subject.
However Briggs’ work will be central to my study as it is one of the most complete works on damages for breach of JAs. I will also briefly examine if the reforms introduced by the Re-Cast EC1215/2012 change the conclusion reached in respect of the current Brussels Regulation I. |
format |
Trabajo de grado (Bachelor Thesis) |
author |
Moreno Prieto, Natalia |
author_facet |
Moreno Prieto, Natalia |
author_sort |
Moreno Prieto, Natalia |
title |
Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement |
title_short |
Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement |
title_full |
Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement |
title_fullStr |
Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement |
title_sort |
critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://babel.banrepcultural.org/cdm/ref/collection/p17054coll23/id/429 |
_version_ |
1682459947898503168 |
score |
12,131701 |