Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement

Following Zoller, Akar and Donohue there has been much debate about the possibility of claiming damages for breach of a JA under the common law system. The debate has also been extended to the question of whether a claim on damages may be an alternative under the framework of Brussels Regulations I,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor Principal: Moreno Prieto, Natalia
Formato: Trabajo de grado (Bachelor Thesis)
Lenguaje:Desconocido (Unknown)
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://babel.banrepcultural.org/cdm/ref/collection/p17054coll23/id/429
id ir-p17054coll23-429
recordtype dspace
spelling ir-p17054coll23-4292020-09-29 Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement Moreno Prieto, Natalia Following Zoller, Akar and Donohue there has been much debate about the possibility of claiming damages for breach of a JA under the common law system. The debate has also been extended to the question of whether a claim on damages may be an alternative under the framework of Brussels Regulations I, particularly in the present context where the European Court of Justice has expressly precluded the use of traditional common law tools to enforce JAs. In this essay I intent to identify, from the existing common law cases, what conditions are required to ground a claim on damages for breach of a JA and if such claim would be compatible with the Brussels Regulation I. For this purpose I will also consider the work of different authors in the subject. However Briggs’ work will be central to my study as it is one of the most complete works on damages for breach of JAs. I will also briefly examine if the reforms introduced by the Re-Cast EC1215/2012 change the conclusion reached in respect of the current Brussels Regulation I. Acuerdos de Jurisdicción; Agreeements on Jurisdiction; Akar case; Brussels Regulations; Cláusulas Jurisdiccionales; Derecho Privado Internacional; Donohue case; International Commercial Litigation; Jurisdicción en la Unión Europea; Jurisdiction on European Union; Litigio Comercial Internacional; Private International Law; Regulación (EC) 1215/2001; Regulación (EC) 44/2001; Regulation (EC) 1215/2012; Regulation (EC) 44/2001; West Tankers case; Zoller case Ciencias sociales; Ciencias sociales / Derecho 2015 PDF Tesis ENG - Inglés Unión Europea Colfuturo © Derechos reservados del autor http://babel.banrepcultural.org/cdm/ref/collection/p17054coll23/id/429
institution Biblioteca Virtual Banco de la República - Colecciones digitales
collection Custom
language Desconocido (Unknown)
topic Acuerdos de Jurisdicción; Agreeements on Jurisdiction; Akar case; Brussels Regulations; Cláusulas Jurisdiccionales; Derecho Privado Internacional; Donohue case; International Commercial Litigation; Jurisdicción en la Unión Europea; Jurisdiction on European Union; Litigio Comercial Internacional; Private International Law; Regulación (EC) 1215/2001; Regulación (EC) 44/2001; Regulation (EC) 1215/2012; Regulation (EC) 44/2001; West Tankers case; Zoller case
Ciencias sociales; Ciencias sociales / Derecho
spellingShingle Acuerdos de Jurisdicción; Agreeements on Jurisdiction; Akar case; Brussels Regulations; Cláusulas Jurisdiccionales; Derecho Privado Internacional; Donohue case; International Commercial Litigation; Jurisdicción en la Unión Europea; Jurisdiction on European Union; Litigio Comercial Internacional; Private International Law; Regulación (EC) 1215/2001; Regulación (EC) 44/2001; Regulation (EC) 1215/2012; Regulation (EC) 44/2001; West Tankers case; Zoller case
Ciencias sociales; Ciencias sociales / Derecho
Moreno Prieto, Natalia
Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement
description Following Zoller, Akar and Donohue there has been much debate about the possibility of claiming damages for breach of a JA under the common law system. The debate has also been extended to the question of whether a claim on damages may be an alternative under the framework of Brussels Regulations I, particularly in the present context where the European Court of Justice has expressly precluded the use of traditional common law tools to enforce JAs. In this essay I intent to identify, from the existing common law cases, what conditions are required to ground a claim on damages for breach of a JA and if such claim would be compatible with the Brussels Regulation I. For this purpose I will also consider the work of different authors in the subject. However Briggs’ work will be central to my study as it is one of the most complete works on damages for breach of JAs. I will also briefly examine if the reforms introduced by the Re-Cast EC1215/2012 change the conclusion reached in respect of the current Brussels Regulation I.
format Trabajo de grado (Bachelor Thesis)
author Moreno Prieto, Natalia
author_facet Moreno Prieto, Natalia
author_sort Moreno Prieto, Natalia
title Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement
title_short Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement
title_full Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement
title_fullStr Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement
title_full_unstemmed Critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement
title_sort critically evaluate the extent to which the english courts may award damages for breach of a jurisdiction agreement
publishDate 2015
url http://babel.banrepcultural.org/cdm/ref/collection/p17054coll23/id/429
_version_ 1682459947898503168
score 12,131701