Judges Cognition and Market Order
We argue that during the crystallization of common and civil law in the 19th century, the optimal degree of discretion in judicial rulemaking, albeit influenced by the comparative advantages of both legislative and judicial rulemaking, was mainly determined by the anti-market biases of the judiciary...
Autores Principales: | Andonova, V., Arruñada, B. |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo (Article) |
Lenguaje: | Inglés (English) |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/1992/46791 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Common Law and Civil Law as Pro-Market Adaptations
por: Andonova, V.
Publicado: (2020) -
Judges, litigants, and the politics of rights enforcement in Argentina
por: Botero, Sandra
Publicado: (2018) -
Law Enforcement Activities in Peacekeeping and Multinational Military Operations: The Cases of Haiti and Afghanistan
por: Olasolo Alonso, Hector, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
JUDGE: LAWMAKER POSITIVE
por: Suarez, Jose Luis
Publicado: (2016) -
The judge of penitentiary surveillance in Spain, as a benchmark for criminal enforcement in Latin America
por: Huertas Díaz, Omar, et al.
Publicado: (2018)