Hypnosis and subjectivity: Thinking about modern science and Psychology

The present article calls for a critical and epistemological reconsideration of hypnosis and its relation with the science of modern psychology. In that sense, it searches for a two-way discussion, which brings up various contradictions present in the upbringing of such science in modern aspects. Fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor Principal: Neubern, Mauricio S.
Formato: Artículo (Article)
Lenguaje:Español (Spanish)
Publicado: Universidad Santo Tomás, Colombia 2009
Materias:
id ir-11634-7191
recordtype dspace
institution Universidad Santo Tomas
collection DSpace
language Español (Spanish)
topic Psicología
epistemología; subjetividad; psicología; hipnosis; ciencia moderna
Psychology
epistemology; subjectivity; psychology; hypnosis; modern science
spellingShingle Psicología
epistemología; subjetividad; psicología; hipnosis; ciencia moderna
Psychology
epistemology; subjectivity; psychology; hypnosis; modern science
Neubern, Mauricio S.
Hypnosis and subjectivity: Thinking about modern science and Psychology
description The present article calls for a critical and epistemological reconsideration of hypnosis and its relation with the science of modern psychology. In that sense, it searches for a two-way discussion, which brings up various contradictions present in the upbringing of such science in modern aspects. First of all, this article highlights the difficulties in putting together clinic and science; in addition, it suggests that the views over hypnosis might as well be applicable, in a general approach, to clinic psychology, which in turn supposes that those thoughts brought by hypnosis are still of considerable pertinence to such association - clinic and science. Second, this article also states that the institutions involved in the formation of psychology did have a crucial role in determining a distorted view not only over hypnosis but also of what could or could not be considered scientific. The present article finally proposes that, although the study of hypnosis does not show a whole array of answers in the modern sense, it still is rather pertinent when it comes to bringing important questions concerning the building of such a science. Some of these questions relate to historical deformations brought about by institutional processes and the scientific aspect of clinic practice.
format Artículo (Article)
author Neubern, Mauricio S.
author_facet Neubern, Mauricio S.
author_sort Neubern, Mauricio S.
title Hypnosis and subjectivity: Thinking about modern science and Psychology
title_short Hypnosis and subjectivity: Thinking about modern science and Psychology
title_full Hypnosis and subjectivity: Thinking about modern science and Psychology
title_fullStr Hypnosis and subjectivity: Thinking about modern science and Psychology
title_full_unstemmed Hypnosis and subjectivity: Thinking about modern science and Psychology
title_sort hypnosis and subjectivity: thinking about modern science and psychology
publisher Universidad Santo Tomás, Colombia
publishDate 2009
_version_ 1712105623365091328
spelling ir-11634-71912019-07-03T15:02:49Z Hypnosis and subjectivity: Thinking about modern science and Psychology La hipnosis y la subjetividad: Reflexiones sobre la ciencia moderna y Psicología Hipnose e Subjetividade: Reflexões Sobre a Ciência Moderna e a Psicologia Neubern, Mauricio S. Psicología epistemología; subjetividad; psicología; hipnosis; ciencia moderna Psychology epistemology; subjectivity; psychology; hypnosis; modern science The present article calls for a critical and epistemological reconsideration of hypnosis and its relation with the science of modern psychology. In that sense, it searches for a two-way discussion, which brings up various contradictions present in the upbringing of such science in modern aspects. First of all, this article highlights the difficulties in putting together clinic and science; in addition, it suggests that the views over hypnosis might as well be applicable, in a general approach, to clinic psychology, which in turn supposes that those thoughts brought by hypnosis are still of considerable pertinence to such association - clinic and science. Second, this article also states that the institutions involved in the formation of psychology did have a crucial role in determining a distorted view not only over hypnosis but also of what could or could not be considered scientific. The present article finally proposes that, although the study of hypnosis does not show a whole array of answers in the modern sense, it still is rather pertinent when it comes to bringing important questions concerning the building of such a science. Some of these questions relate to historical deformations brought about by institutional processes and the scientific aspect of clinic practice. El presente artículo invita a una reconsideración crítica y epistemológica de la hipnosis y su relación con la ciencia de la Psicología moderna. En este sentido, busca una discusión de dos vías que trae a colación varias contradicciones presentes en la invocación de esta ciencia en los aspectos modernos. Primero, el artículo enfatiza las dificultades de unir clínica y ciencia; adicionalmente sugiere que las visiones de la hipnosis pueden ser aplicables también, de forma general, a la psicología clínica, que a su vez supone que los pensamientos evocados por la hipnosis todavía tienen una pertinencia considerable para esta asociación, clínica y ciencia. Segundo, el artículo también postula que las instituciones involucradas en la formación de la Psicología tuvieron un papel crucial en la determinación de una visión distorsionada no sólo de la hipnosis sino de lo que podría o no considerarse científico. Finalmente, el artículo propone que aunque el estudio de la hipnosis no muestra una gran cantidad de respuestas en el sentido moderno, todavía es pertinente al invocar preguntas importantes sobre la construcción de dicha ciencia. Algunas de estas preguntas están relacionadas con las deformaciones históricas hechas por los procesos institucionales y por el aspecto científico de la práctica clínica. O presente artigo propõe uma releitura crítica e epistemológica da hipnose em suas relações com o projeto de ciência da psicologia moderna. Para tanto, busca uma discussão em dois sentidos que destaca diversas contradições presentes na construção dessa ciência nos moldes modernos. Em primeiro lugar, destaca as dificuldades em associar clínica e ciência, destacando, sobretudo, que as críticas efetivadas à hipnose também são aplicáveis às psicologia clínica de um modo geral, o que pressupõe que os problemas trazidos pela hipnose ainda são de considerável pertinência para tal associação. Em segundo lugar, ressalta que as instituições presentes na construção da psicologia possuíram um papel crucial na determinação de uma visão pejorativa sobre a hipnose, como também sobre o que poderia ou não ser considerado científico. O artigo é finalizado propondo que, embora o estudo da hipnose não permita oferecer muitas respostas no sentido moderno, ele ainda é bastante pertinente por trazer perguntas de grande relevância sobre a construção dessa ciência, como as referentes às deformações históricas promovidas por processos institucionais e cientificidade da prática clínica. Palavras-chave: epistemologia, subjetividade, psicologia, hipnose, ciência moderna. 2009-06-21 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/diversitas/article/view/171 10.15332/s1794-9998.2009.0002.07 spa https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/diversitas/article/view/171/261 https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/diversitas/article/view/171/262 application/pdf text/html Universidad Santo Tomás, Colombia Diversitas; Vol. 5, Núm. 2 (2009); 307-319 Diversitas; Vol. 5, Núm. 2 (2009); 307-319 2256-3067 1794-9998
score 12,111491