Brief approach to presidentialism: lights and shadows in Latin American context.
More than two decades ago started the controversy about the identification of the best way of government in Latin America and its consequences for democratic stability. This caused that different and several academicians had identified the arguments collected in the first part of this article, in or...
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo (Article) |
| Lenguaje: | Español (Spanish) |
| Publicado: |
University Santo Tomás, Bogotá
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/11634/27194 |
| id |
ir-11634-27194 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
dspace |
| spelling |
ir-11634-271942020-06-18T22:42:05Z Brief approach to presidentialism: lights and shadows in Latin American context. Breve aproximación al presidencialismo: luces y sombras en el contexto Latinoamericano Vega, Lorena presidentialism democratic consolidation presidential interruptions extreme multipartidism Latin America presidencialismo consolidación democrática caídas presidenciales multipartidismo extremo América Latina. More than two decades ago started the controversy about the identification of the best way of government in Latin America and its consequences for democratic stability. This caused that different and several academicians had identified the arguments collected in the first part of this article, in order to consider the presidential regime as more or less ideal. In the second part, we summarize the foundations and interpretations maintained around presidentialism’s phenomena as presidential interruptions and extreme multipartidism. To finish the article we condense the main stances that have given an answer to the perpetual debate “Parliamentarism vs. Presidentialism”. Hace más de dos décadas ha iniciado la polémica en torno a la identificación de la mejor forma de gobierno en América Latina y sus consecuencias para la estabilidad democrática. Esto ha ocasionado que diversos y varios académicos hayan identificado los argumentos que se recogen en la primera parte de este artículo, para considerar más o menos óptimo el régimen presidencial. En la segunda parte, se sintetizan los fundamentos e interpretaciones que se han sostenido alrededor de los fenómenos que acontecen en el presidencialismo, como las caídas presidenciales y el multipartidismo extremo. Para finalizar el artículo, se condensan las principales posturas que han dado respuesta al perpetuo debate de “parlamentarismo versus presidencialismo”. 2013-06-30 2020-06-18T22:42:05Z 2020-06-18T22:42:05Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/viei/article/view/843 10.15332/s1909-0528.2013.0001.03 http://hdl.handle.net/11634/27194 spa https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/viei/article/view/843/1124 application/pdf University Santo Tomás, Bogotá Via Inveniendi Et Iudicandi; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2013); 68-101 Via Inveniendi Et Iudicandi; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2013); 68-101 1909-0528 |
| institution |
Universidad Santo Tomas |
| collection |
DSpace |
| language |
Español (Spanish) |
| topic |
presidentialism democratic consolidation presidential interruptions extreme multipartidism Latin America presidencialismo consolidación democrática caídas presidenciales multipartidismo extremo América Latina. |
| spellingShingle |
presidentialism democratic consolidation presidential interruptions extreme multipartidism Latin America presidencialismo consolidación democrática caídas presidenciales multipartidismo extremo América Latina. Vega, Lorena Brief approach to presidentialism: lights and shadows in Latin American context. |
| description |
More than two decades ago started the controversy about the identification of the best way of government in Latin America and its consequences for democratic stability. This caused that different and several academicians had identified the arguments collected in the first part of this article, in order to consider the presidential regime as more or less ideal. In the second part, we summarize the foundations and interpretations maintained around presidentialism’s phenomena as presidential interruptions and extreme multipartidism. To finish the article we condense the main stances that have given an answer to the perpetual debate “Parliamentarism vs. Presidentialism”. |
| format |
Artículo (Article) |
| author |
Vega, Lorena |
| author_facet |
Vega, Lorena |
| author_sort |
Vega, Lorena |
| title |
Brief approach to presidentialism: lights and shadows in Latin American context. |
| title_short |
Brief approach to presidentialism: lights and shadows in Latin American context. |
| title_full |
Brief approach to presidentialism: lights and shadows in Latin American context. |
| title_fullStr |
Brief approach to presidentialism: lights and shadows in Latin American context. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Brief approach to presidentialism: lights and shadows in Latin American context. |
| title_sort |
brief approach to presidentialism: lights and shadows in latin american context. |
| publisher |
University Santo Tomás, Bogotá |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/27194 |
| _version_ |
1712104944127967232 |
| score |
12,111491 |