The binding force of the jurisprudence of the Council of State
Constitutional jurisprudence is considered a formal and material source of law in the Colombian legal system, hence its binding force in the decisions of judicial and administrative authorities. This recognition, derived from the judicial function of the Constitutional Court, does not occur in the c...
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo (Article) |
| Lenguaje: | Español (Spanish) |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá-Colombia
2018
|
| Materias: |
| id |
ir-11634-26308 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
dspace |
| institution |
Universidad Santo Tomas |
| collection |
DSpace |
| language |
Español (Spanish) |
| topic |
jurisprudence law precedent binding force judicial arbitration judge administration jurisprudencia ley precedente fuerza vinculante arbitrio judicial juez administración jurisprudência lei precedente força vinculante arbítrio judicial juiz administração |
| spellingShingle |
jurisprudence law precedent binding force judicial arbitration judge administration jurisprudencia ley precedente fuerza vinculante arbitrio judicial juez administración jurisprudência lei precedente força vinculante arbítrio judicial juiz administração Vargas Florián, Sandra Mercedes The binding force of the jurisprudence of the Council of State |
| description |
Constitutional jurisprudence is considered a formal and material source of law in the Colombian legal system, hence its binding force in the decisions of judicial and administrative authorities. This recognition, derived from the judicial function of the Constitutional Court, does not occur in the contentious-administrative jurisdiction, since the Council of State has not managed to make a diligent issuance, compilation and publication of decisions with a binding character. This investigation focuses its attention on the contentious-administrative jurisdiction and on the binding nature of jurisprudence originating from the Council of State. Herein are studied new legal figures contemplated in Law 1437 of 2011 such as the duty of uniform application of jurisprudence, the extension of the jurisprudence of the Council of State to third parties by authorities, the extraordinary appeal of unification of jurisprudence and the judgments of unification.The binding nature of the judgments of unification issued by the Council of State is established in accordance to this law. It also shows how, if the application is achieved of the new figures and procedures studied, it will contribute to the recognition of the binding force of jurisprudence from the Council of State, clearing backlogs and protecting important values of the legal system, as well as equality of treatment and legal certainty in contentious-administrative issues. |
| format |
Artículo (Article) |
| author |
Vargas Florián, Sandra Mercedes |
| author_facet |
Vargas Florián, Sandra Mercedes |
| author_sort |
Vargas Florián, Sandra Mercedes |
| title |
The binding force of the jurisprudence of the Council of State |
| title_short |
The binding force of the jurisprudence of the Council of State |
| title_full |
The binding force of the jurisprudence of the Council of State |
| title_fullStr |
The binding force of the jurisprudence of the Council of State |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The binding force of the jurisprudence of the Council of State |
| title_sort |
binding force of the jurisprudence of the council of state |
| publisher |
Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá-Colombia |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| _version_ |
1712106000144662528 |
| spelling |
ir-11634-263082021-03-17T20:13:41Z The binding force of the jurisprudence of the Council of State La fuerza vinculante de la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado A força vinculante da jurisprudência do Conselho de Estado Vargas Florián, Sandra Mercedes jurisprudence law precedent binding force judicial arbitration judge administration jurisprudencia ley precedente fuerza vinculante arbitrio judicial juez administración jurisprudência lei precedente força vinculante arbítrio judicial juiz administração Constitutional jurisprudence is considered a formal and material source of law in the Colombian legal system, hence its binding force in the decisions of judicial and administrative authorities. This recognition, derived from the judicial function of the Constitutional Court, does not occur in the contentious-administrative jurisdiction, since the Council of State has not managed to make a diligent issuance, compilation and publication of decisions with a binding character. This investigation focuses its attention on the contentious-administrative jurisdiction and on the binding nature of jurisprudence originating from the Council of State. Herein are studied new legal figures contemplated in Law 1437 of 2011 such as the duty of uniform application of jurisprudence, the extension of the jurisprudence of the Council of State to third parties by authorities, the extraordinary appeal of unification of jurisprudence and the judgments of unification.The binding nature of the judgments of unification issued by the Council of State is established in accordance to this law. It also shows how, if the application is achieved of the new figures and procedures studied, it will contribute to the recognition of the binding force of jurisprudence from the Council of State, clearing backlogs and protecting important values of the legal system, as well as equality of treatment and legal certainty in contentious-administrative issues. La jurisprudencia constitucional es considerada como fuente formal y material del derecho en el sistema jurídico colombiano, de ahí procede su fuerza vinculante en las decisiones de las autoridades judiciales y administrativas. Este reconocimiento, derivado de la función judicial de la Corte Constitucional, no se da en la jurisdicción de lo contencioso administrativo, toda vez que el Consejo de Estado no se ha ocupado de una acuciosa expedición, recopilación y publicación de sentencias con carácter vinculante. Esta investigación enfoca su atención en la jurisdicción de lo contencioso administrativo y en el carácter vinculante de la jurisprudencia emanada del Consejo de Estado. Son estudiadas aquí nuevas figuras jurídicas contempladas en la Ley 1437 de 2011, tales como el deber de aplicación uniforme de la jurisprudencia, la extensión de la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado a terceros por parte de las autoridades, el recurso extraordinario de unificación de la jurisprudencia y las sentencias de unificación.Se establece el carácter vinculante que ostentan las sentencias de unificación proferidas por el Consejo de Estado de conformidad con esta ley. Además se muestra cómo, si se logra la aplicación de las nuevas figuras y los procedimientos estudiados, se contribuirá al reconocimiento de la fuerza vinculante de la jurisprudencia emanada del Consejo de Estado, a la descongestión judicial y a la protección de valores importantes del sistema jurídico, así como a la igualdad de trato y seguridad jurídica en materia de lo contencioso administrativo. A jurisprudência constitucional é considerada como fonte formal e material do direito no sistema jurídico colombiano, daí procede a sua forca vinculante nas decisões de autoridades judiciais e administrativas. Este reconhecimento derivado da função judicial da Corte Constitucional não ocorre na jurisdição do contencioso administrativo, toda vez que o Conselho de Estado não tem se ocupado de uma diligente expedição, recopilação e publicação de sentenças com caráter vinculante.Esta pesquisa foca sua atenção na jurisdição do contencioso administrativo e no caráter vinculante da jurisprudência emanada do Conselho de Estado. São estudadas novas figuras jurídicas contempladas na Lei 1437 de 2011, como: o dever de aplicação uniforme da jurisprudência, a extensão da jurisprudência do Conselho de Estado a terceiros por parte das autoridades, o recurso extraordinário de unificação de jurisprudência e as sentenças de unificação.Estabelece-se o caráter vinculante que ostentam as sentenças de unificação proferidas pelo Conselho de Estado de acordo com esta lei. Além se mostra como se conseguir a aplicação das novas figuras e os procedimentos estudados se contribuirá ao reconhecimento da força vinculante da jurisprudência emanada do Conselho de Estado o descongestionamento judicial e a proteção de valores importantes do sistema jurídico, assim como à igualdade de trato e segurança jurídica no relacionado com o contencioso administrativo. 2018-02-28 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/4089 10.15332/s1900-0448.2018.0048.05 spa https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/4089/3884 https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/4089/html Derechos de autor 2018 IUSTA application/pdf text/html Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá-Colombia IUSTA; No. 48 (2018); 119-144 IUSTA; Núm. 48 (2018); 119-144 2500-5286 1900-0448 |
| score |
12,131701 |