| Sumario: | This paper aims to glimpse the horizons of the fertile field of intercultural dialogue in legal argumentation. In this setting, reflection is encouraged on a proposal for plural legal argumentation that integrates the essentials of both standard doctrine and other argumentative forms that, from the Andean intercultural philosophy, suggest a legal argumentation structure based on the worldview of the Chakana. In order to live well, ordinary, peasant indigenous, and agro-environmental jurisdictions, as well as magistrate judges and tribunals and the Bolivian Plurinational Constitutional Court, should address each case using a plural conception of legality. Thus, in bringing together dialogic practices and procedures, the fabric of interculturalism will ensure, from a feel-thinking perspective of law, harmonious relationships and coexistence between individuals and their surroundings.
|
|---|
