Importance of the indiciary test in the processes of direct repair derived from serious violations of human rights by the Colombian State

The present article of reflection analyzes the circumstantial evidence and its importance in processes of Direct Reparation due to serious violations of Human Rights at the head of the Colombian State. The judge of administrative litigation enjoys a wide margin of probative value attached to sound c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor Principal: Barros Romero, Leonardo Daniel
Formato: http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Lenguaje:Español (Spanish)
Publicado: Universidad Libre 2018
Materias:
id ir-10901-15644
recordtype dspace
spelling ir-10901-156442021-05-20T23:37:27Z Importance of the indiciary test in the processes of direct repair derived from serious violations of human rights by the Colombian State Importancia de la prueba indiciaria en los procesos de reparación directa derivados de graves violaciones a los derechos humanos por parte del Estado Colombiano Barros Romero, Leonardo Daniel Derechos humanos Derecho procesal Prueba indiciaria The present article of reflection analyzes the circumstantial evidence and its importance in processes of Direct Reparation due to serious violations of Human Rights at the head of the Colombian State. The judge of administrative litigation enjoys a wide margin of probative value attached to sound criticism, which is "the judge's ability to give the evidence the greater or lesser credibility, according to its connection with the facts to be demonstrated and its ability to conviction "(Constitutional Court, 2017), thus allowing us to use different evidentiary standards to search for the real truth, without setting aside its position to criteria of certainty. In the case of burdensome behavior against human rights by the State, circumstantial evidence has become the most important standard. El presente artículo de reflexión analiza la prueba indiciaria y su importancia en procesos de Reparación Directa por motivo de graves violaciones a los Derechos Humanos en cabeza del Estado colombiano. El juez de lo contencioso administrativo goza de un amplio margen de valoración probatoria apegada a la sana crítica, que es “la capacidad del juez para darle a las pruebas la mayor o menor credibilidad, según su conexión con los hechos a demostrar y su capacidad de convencimiento” (Corte Constitucional, 2017), permitiendo así utilizar diferentes estándares probatorios para buscar la verdad real, sin dejar de lado ajustar su posición a criterios de certeza. En tratándose de conductas gravosas contra los derechos humanos por parte del Estado, la prueba indiciaria se ha convertido en el estándar más importante.  2018-04-28 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/advocatus/article/view/5053 10.18041/0124-0102/a.30.5053 spa https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/advocatus/article/view/5053/4326 Revistas - Ciencias Sociales y Humanas Derechos de autor 2018 Advocatus http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 application/pdf Universidad Libre Advocatus; No 30 (2018): Advocatus; 135-153 Advocatus; Núm. 30 (2018): Advocatus; 135-153 Advocatus; No 30 (2018): Advocatus; 135-153 Advocatus; n. 30 (2018): Advocatus; 135-153 2390-0202 0124-0102
institution Universidad Libre de Colombia
collection DSpace
language Español (Spanish)
topic Derechos humanos
Derecho procesal
Prueba indiciaria
spellingShingle Derechos humanos
Derecho procesal
Prueba indiciaria
Barros Romero, Leonardo Daniel
Importance of the indiciary test in the processes of direct repair derived from serious violations of human rights by the Colombian State
description The present article of reflection analyzes the circumstantial evidence and its importance in processes of Direct Reparation due to serious violations of Human Rights at the head of the Colombian State. The judge of administrative litigation enjoys a wide margin of probative value attached to sound criticism, which is "the judge's ability to give the evidence the greater or lesser credibility, according to its connection with the facts to be demonstrated and its ability to conviction "(Constitutional Court, 2017), thus allowing us to use different evidentiary standards to search for the real truth, without setting aside its position to criteria of certainty. In the case of burdensome behavior against human rights by the State, circumstantial evidence has become the most important standard.
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
author Barros Romero, Leonardo Daniel
author_facet Barros Romero, Leonardo Daniel
author_sort Barros Romero, Leonardo Daniel
title Importance of the indiciary test in the processes of direct repair derived from serious violations of human rights by the Colombian State
title_short Importance of the indiciary test in the processes of direct repair derived from serious violations of human rights by the Colombian State
title_full Importance of the indiciary test in the processes of direct repair derived from serious violations of human rights by the Colombian State
title_fullStr Importance of the indiciary test in the processes of direct repair derived from serious violations of human rights by the Colombian State
title_full_unstemmed Importance of the indiciary test in the processes of direct repair derived from serious violations of human rights by the Colombian State
title_sort importance of the indiciary test in the processes of direct repair derived from serious violations of human rights by the colombian state
publisher Universidad Libre
publishDate 2018
_version_ 1700905238910730240
score 11,828437