Vista Equipo: Exploring the internal policy - international policy distinction: State of the art about the debate

Exploring the internal policy - international policy distinction: State of the art about the debate

For some theorist the conduct of states is mainly determined by its domestic features. In contrast others argue that state behavior is shaped by the place they occupy in the international system. The purpose here is to address this discussion and make a state of the art of this discussion in the Int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor Principal:	Jiménez Peña, Gabriel
Formato:	Artículo (Article)
Lenguaje:	Español (Spanish)
Publicado:	Universidad Militar Nueva Granada 2015
Materias:	International political economy internal policy international policy international relations theory. Economía política internacional política interna política internacional teoría de las relaciones internacionales Economia política internacional teoria das relações internacionais
Acceso en línea:	http://hdl.handle.net/10654/34699

id	ir-10654-34699
recordtype	dspace
institution	Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
collection	DSpace
language	Español (Spanish)
topic	International political economy internal policy international policy international relations theory. Economía política internacional política interna política internacional teoría de las relaciones internacionales Economia política internacional política interna política internacional teoria das relações internacionais
spellingShingle	International political economy internal policy international policy international relations theory. Economía política internacional política interna política internacional teoría de las relaciones internacionales Economia política internacional política interna política internacional teoria das relações internacionais Jiménez Peña, Gabriel Exploring the internal policy - international policy distinction: State of the art about the debate
description	For some theorist the conduct of states is mainly determined by its domestic features. In contrast others argue that state behavior is shaped by the place they occupy in the international system. The purpose here is to address this discussion and make a state of the art of this discussion in the International Relations as a science. Given that the literary body that explores the internal - international political interaction is too extensive, to deal with o build it, generally turn to assumptions or common ideas, five of them will be problematize in this paper, looking for how it been produced, according to the theoretical development that have built in the last years about this discussion.
format	Artículo (Article)
author	Jiménez Peña, Gabriel
author_facet	Jiménez Peña, Gabriel
author_sort	Jiménez Peña, Gabriel
title	Exploring the internal policy - international policy distinction: State of the art about the debate
title_short	Exploring the internal policy - international policy distinction: State of the art about the debate
title_full	Exploring the internal policy - international policy distinction: State of the art about the debate
title_fullStr	Exploring the internal policy - international policy distinction: State of the art about the debate
title_full_unstemmed	Exploring the internal policy - international policy distinction: State of the art about the debate
title_sort	exploring the internal policy - international policy distinction: state of the art about the debate
publisher	Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
publishDate	2015
url	http://hdl.handle.net/10654/34699
_version_	1712101919368937472
spelling	ir-10654-346992020-01-08T19:42:10Z Exploring the internal policy - international policy distinction: State of the art about the debate Explorando la distinción política interna - política internacional: un estado del arte de la discusión Explorando a distinção política interna - política exterior: Um estado da arte da discussão Jiménez Peña, Gabriel International political economy internal policy international policy international relations theory. Economía política internacional política interna política internacional teoría de las relaciones internacionales Economia política internacional política interna política internacional teoria das relações internacionais For some theorist the conduct of states is mainly determined by its domestic features. In contrast others argue that state behavior is shaped by the place they occupy in the international system. The purpose here is to address this discussion and make a state of the art of this discussion in the International Relations as a science. Given that the literary body that explores the internal - international political interaction is too extensive, to deal with o build it, generally turn to assumptions or common ideas, five of them will be problematize in this paper, looking for how it been produced, according to the theoretical development that have built in the last years about this discussion. Para algunos teóricos la conducta de los Estados está determinada principalmente por sus características internas. En contraposición, otros argumentan que el comportamiento estatal está moldeado por el lugar que ocupan estos en el sistema internacional. El propósito aquí es abordar esta discusión y elaborar un estado del arte sobre esta distinción en las Relaciones Internacionales como ciencia. Dado que el cuerpo literario que explora la interacción política interna-política internacional es muy vasto, para abordarla o reconstruirla generalmente se acude a supuestos o lugares comunes, cinco de los cuales serán problematizados en este artículo, buscando mostrar cómo se producen de acuerdo con los desarrollos teóricos que se han construido en los últimos años sobre esta distinción. Para alguns teóricos a conduta dos Estados está determinada principalmente por suas características internas. Em oposição, outros argumentam que o comportamento do Estado é moldado pelo lugar que ocupam eles no sistema internacional. O propósito aqui é abranger esta discussão e elaborar um estado da arte sobre ela na Relações Internacionais como ciência. Dado que o corpo literário que explora a interação política interna - política internacional é vasto, para aborda-lo o reconstitui-lo, geralmente se acudi a supostos o lugares comuns, cinco dos quais serão problematizados neste artigo, procurando mostrar como produzem-se de acordo com os desenvolvimentos teóricos que tem construído nos últimos anos sobre este distinção. 2015-06-05 2020-01-08T19:42:10Z 2020-01-08T19:42:10Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/848 10.18359/ries.848 http://hdl.handle.net/10654/34699 spa http://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/848/599 /ref/Adler, I. (2013). Constructivism. En W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse y B. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 112-144). Londres: SAGE. /ref/Ahluwalia, P. (2001). Politics and post-colonial theory. African Inflections. Nueva York: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203187890 /ref/Allison, G. (2002). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown. /ref/Ames, B. (1987). Political survival: Politicians and public policy in Latin America. Londres: University of California Press. /ref/Arreaza, C. & Tickner, A. (2002) Postmodernismo, postcolonialismo y feminismo: manual para (in)expertos. Colombia Internacional, (54), 14-98. /ref/Ashley, R. (1987). The geopolitics of geopolitical space: Toward a critical social theory of international politics. Alternatives 12(4), 403-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030437548701200401 /ref/Atli, A. (2011). Businessmen as diplomats: The role of business associations in Turkey's foreign economic policy. Insight Turkey, 13(1), 109-128. /ref/Axelrod, R. (1981). The emergence of cooperation among egoist. American Political Science Review, (75). http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1961366 /ref/Baldwin, D. (1993). Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. Nueva York: Columbia University Press. /ref/Bhabha, H. (1994). The Location of culture. New York: Routledge. /ref/Biersteker, T. (1987). Multinationals, the State, and control of the Nigerian economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400858507 /ref/Campbell, D. (1998). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. /ref/Campbell, D. (2013). Poststructuralism. En Dunne, T, Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.), International Relations theory: Discipline and diversity (pp. 223-246). Oxford: Oxford University Press. /ref/Caporaso, J. (1978). Dependence, dependency and power in the global system: A structural and behavioral analysis. International organization, 32(1), 13-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300003842 /ref/Carlsnaes, W. (2013). Foreign policy. En W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse y B. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 298-326). Londres: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n12 /ref/Cohn, T. (2012). Global political economy: Theory and practice. Nueva York: Pearson. /ref/Cox, G. & McCubbins, M. (2001). The institutional determinants of economic policy outcomes. En Haggard, S. & McCubbins, M. (Eds.), Presidents, parliaments, and policy (pp. 21-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. /ref/Cox, R. (1981). Social forces, States and world order: Beyond International Relations theory. En Keohane, R. (Ed.), Neorealism and its critics (pp. 204-254). Nueva York: Columbia University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501 /ref/Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press. /ref/Davies, G. (2002). Domestic strife and the initiation of international conflicts: a directed dyad analysis, 1950-1982. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(5), 672-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002200202236169 /ref/Der Derian, J. & Shapiro, M. (1989) International/intertextual relations: Postmodern readings of world politics (Issues in world politics). Lexington: Lexington Books. /ref/Deudney, D. & Ikenberry, G. (1999). The nature and sources of liberal international order. Review of International Studies, 25(2), 179-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210599001795 /ref/Doyle, M. (1996). Kant, liberal legacies and foreign policy. En Brown, M. Lynn-Jones, S. & Miller, S. (Eds.), Debating the democratic peace. Cambridge (pp. 3-57). Massachusetts: MIT Press. /ref/Downs, G. & Rocke, D. (1995). Optimal imperfection? Domestic uncertainty and institutions in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. /ref/Dür, A. y Elsig, M. (2011). Principals, agents, and the European Union's foreign economic policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(3), 323-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.551066 /ref/Evans, P. (1979). Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press. /ref/Fearon, J. (1994). Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 577-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2944796 /ref/Fearon, J. (1995). Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization, 49(3), 379-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033324 /ref/Finnemore, M. & Sikkink, K. (1999). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. En Katzenstein, P., Keohane, R. & Krasner, S. (Eds.), Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics (pp. 247-277). Cambridge: MIT Press. /ref/Foucault, M. (1979). Power, Truth, strategy. Sidney: Feral publications. /ref/Foucault, M. (1998). El sujeto y el poder. Por qué estudiar el poder: la cuestión del sujeto. Texto y contexto, (35). /ref/Frieden, J. (1991). Invested interests: the politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance. International Organization, 45(4), 425-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033178 /ref/Frieden, J. & Rogowski, R. (1996). The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview. En R. O. Keohane, R. & Milner, H. (Eds.), Internationalization and Domestic Politics (pp. 25-47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511664168.003 /ref/George, A. (1969). The "Operational Code": A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision Making. International Studies Quarterly, (13), 190-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3013944 /ref/George, J. & Campbell, D. (1990). Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 34(3), 269-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2600570 /ref/Glaser, C. (1995). Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help. International Security (19), 50-90. /ref/Glaser, C. (2010). Rational Theory of International Politics: The Logic of Competition and Cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400835133 /ref/Gourevitch, P. (2002). Domestic Politics and International Relations, En Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. & Simmons, B. (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 309-328). Londres: Sage Publications. /ref/Greenaway, D. & Kneller, R. (2007). Firm heterogeneity, exporting and Foreign direct Investment. The Economic Journal, 117(517), 134-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02018.x /ref/Grovogui, S. (2006). Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy: Memories of International Order and Institutions. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-08396-8 /ref/Grovogui, S. (2013). Postcolonialism. En: Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theory: Discipline and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press. /ref/Guzzini, S. (1998). Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. Londres: Routledge. /ref/Haggard, S. (1990). Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries. Nueva York: Cornell University Press. /ref/Haggard S. & Kaufman, R. (1992). The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press. /ref/Haggard S. & Kaufman, R. (1995). The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. /ref/Held, D. & McGrew, A. (2003). The Global Transformations. Reader: Polity Press. /ref/Hiscox, M. (2010). The Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policies. En Ravenhill, J. (Ed.), Global Political Economy (pp. 51-83). Oxford: Oxford University Press. /ref/Hurrell, A. (2013). Ethics and Norms in International Relations. En Carlsnaes, W. Risse, T. & Simmons, B. (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 57-85). Londres: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n3 /ref/Inayatullah, N. & Blaney, D. (2004). International Relations and the Problem of Difference. Nueva York and Londres: Routledge. /ref/Ikenberry, J. (1988). Conclusion: An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Policy. En Ikenberry, J. Lake, D. & Mastanduno, M. (Eds.), The State and American Foreign economic policy (pp. 219-243). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300007189 /ref/Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. /ref/Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. /ref/Kahler, M. (2000). The state of the State in World Politics. San Diego: University of California. /ref/Katzenstein, P. (1996). Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press /ref/Keohane, R. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. /ref/Keohane, R. (1993) Instituciones Internacionales y Poder Estatal: Ensayos sobre Teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales. Buenos Aires: GEL. /ref/Keohane, R. & Helen, V. (Eds.) (1996). Internationalization and Domestic Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. /ref/Keohane, R. & Nye, J. ([1977]. 2001). Power and Interdependence. Nueva York: Longman. /ref/Kratochwil, F. (2007). Looking back from somewhere: Reflections on What Remains "Critical" in Critical Theory. Review of International Studies, (33), 25-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007383 /ref/Kurki, M. & Wight, C. (2013). International Relations and Social Science. En Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.), International Relations Theory: Discipline and Diversity (pp. 14-35). Oxford: Oxford University Press. /ref/Lake, D. (2013). Theory Is Dead. Long live Theory. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 567-587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494330 /ref/Lapid, Y. (1989). The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a "Postpositivist" Era. International Studies Quarterly, (37), 459-489. /ref/Lebow, R. (2003). The Tragic vision of Politics: Ethics, Interest and Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511491504 /ref/Lebow, R. N. (2013). Classical realism. En Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.), International Relations Theory: Discipline and Diversity (pp. 59-76). Oxford: Oxford University Press. /ref/Linklater, A. (1990). Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230374546 /ref/Mapel D. & Nardin T. (eds.) (1992). Traditions of International Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. /ref/Mapel D. & Nardin T. (1998). International Society. Diverse Ethical Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press. /ref/March, J. & Olsen J. (2002). Rediscovering Institutions: the Organizational Basis of Politics. Nueva York: Free Press/Macmillan. /ref/Martin, L. & Simmons, B. (2013). International organizations and institutions. En Carlsnaes, W. Risse, T. & Simmons, B. (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 326-351). Londres: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n13 /ref/Mearsheimer, J. (1994). The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2539078 /ref/Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Nueva York: Norton. /ref/Milner, H. (1997). Interest, Institutions and Formation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. /ref/Milner, H. (1998). Rationalizing Politics: The Emerging Synthesis of International, American, and Comparative Politics. International Organization, 52(4), 759-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/002081898550743 /ref/Morgenthau, H. (1990). Otro gran debate: el interés nacional de los Estados Unidos. En Morgenthau, H. Escritos sobre política internacional (pp. 99-109). Madrid: Tecnos. /ref/Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513-553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447 /ref/Oye, K. (1986). Cooperation under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. /ref/Oatley, T. (2011). International Political Economy: Interests and Institutions in the Global Economy. Nueva York: Pearson Longman. /ref/Peterson, V. & True, J. (1998). New Times and new conversations. En Peterson, V. & True, J. The 'Man' question in International relations. Boulder: Westview Press. /ref/Rengger, N. (1999). Political Theory and the Problem of Order. Beyond International Relations Theory? Londres: Routledge. /ref/Rengger, N. & Thirkell-White, B. (2007). Still Critical after All These Years? The Past, the Present and the Future of Critical Theory in International Relations. Review of International Studies, (33), 3-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007371 /ref/Risse, T., Ropp, S., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511598777 /ref/Rogowski, R, (1989). Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Aligments. Princeton: Princeton University Press. /ref/Rosati, J. (1995). A cognitive approach to the study of foreign policy. En Neack, L., Haney, P. & Hey, J. (Eds.), Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in its Second Generation (pp. 49-70). Nueva Jersey: Prentice Hall. /ref/Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, (51), 144-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814 /ref/Rosenau, J. (1980). Pre-Theories and theories of foreign policy. En J. Rosenau, The scientific study of foreign policy (pp. 115-169). Londres: Nichols Pub. /ref/Russett, B. (1993). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-Cold War world. Princeton: Princeton University Press. /ref/Russett, B. (2013). Liberalism. En Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.), International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity (pp. 94-113). Oxford: Oxford University Press. /ref/Shugart, M. & Haggard, S. (2001). Institutions and public policy in presidential systems. En Haggard, S., & McCubbins, M. (Eds.), Presidents, parliaments and policy (pp. 64-102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. /ref/Schultz, K. (2013). Domestic politics and International Relations. En Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. & Simmons, B. (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 478-502). Londres: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n19 /ref/Snyder, J. (1991). The Myths of Empire: Domestic politics and international ambition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. /ref/Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? En. Nelson, C. & Grossberg, L. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Basingstoke: Macmillan. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_20 Derechos de autor 2016 De Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 application/pdf Universidad Militar Nueva Granada Revista Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol 10 No 2 (2015): Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; 237-259 Revista Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2015): Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; 237-259 1909-7743 1909-3063
score	12,131701

Exploring the internal policy - international policy distinction: State of the art about the debate

Ejemplares similares