Washington consensus and post-consensus: two generations of incomplete reforms

There is a missing dimension on the economic reforms of the Washington consensus, as well as in the institutional turn of the post-washington consensus: the political and social aspects. policy harmonization of both generations of reforms has failed to acknowledge the political centrality of the act...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor Principal: Cuadra Montiel, Hector
Formato: Artículo (Article)
Lenguaje:Español (Spanish)
Publicado: Universidad Militar Nueva Granada 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10654/34557
id ir-10654-34557
recordtype dspace
institution Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
collection DSpace
language Español (Spanish)
topic Consensus
post-consensus
reform
economy
institution
actor
agency
Consenso
pos-consenso
reforma
economía
institución
actor
agencia
Consenso
pós- consenso
reforma
economia
instituição
ator
spellingShingle Consensus
post-consensus
reform
economy
institution
actor
agency
Consenso
pos-consenso
reforma
economía
institución
actor
agencia
Consenso
pós- consenso
reforma
economia
instituição
ator
Cuadra Montiel, Hector
Washington consensus and post-consensus: two generations of incomplete reforms
description There is a missing dimension on the economic reforms of the Washington consensus, as well as in the institutional turn of the post-washington consensus: the political and social aspects. policy harmonization of both generations of reforms has failed to acknowledge the political centrality of the actors (agencies) on those processes in which they are active, ignoring the intentional, contingent and unpredictable character they manage to give it.
format Artículo (Article)
author Cuadra Montiel, Hector
author_facet Cuadra Montiel, Hector
author_sort Cuadra Montiel, Hector
title Washington consensus and post-consensus: two generations of incomplete reforms
title_short Washington consensus and post-consensus: two generations of incomplete reforms
title_full Washington consensus and post-consensus: two generations of incomplete reforms
title_fullStr Washington consensus and post-consensus: two generations of incomplete reforms
title_full_unstemmed Washington consensus and post-consensus: two generations of incomplete reforms
title_sort washington consensus and post-consensus: two generations of incomplete reforms
publisher Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10654/34557
_version_ 1712101641294970880
spelling ir-10654-345572020-01-08T19:41:08Z Washington consensus and post-consensus: two generations of incomplete reforms Consenso y pos-consenso de Washington: dos generaciones de reformas incompletas Consenso e pós-consenso de Washington: duas gerações de reformas incompletas Cuadra Montiel, Hector Consensus post-consensus reform economy institution actor agency Consenso pos-consenso reforma economía institución actor agencia Consenso pós- consenso reforma economia instituição ator There is a missing dimension on the economic reforms of the Washington consensus, as well as in the institutional turn of the post-washington consensus: the political and social aspects. policy harmonization of both generations of reforms has failed to acknowledge the political centrality of the actors (agencies) on those processes in which they are active, ignoring the intentional, contingent and unpredictable character they manage to give it. La dimensión perdida de las reformas emprendidas tanto por el énfasis macro-económico del Consenso de Washington, como por el tenor institucional del pos-Consenso radica en lo político y lo social. La pretensión de armonización de ambas generaciones de reformas ha fallado en reconocer la centralidad política de los actores en los procesos en los que toman parte activa, ignorando el carácter intencional, contingente e impredecible que logran imprimirle. A dimensão perdida das reformas empreendidas tanto pela ênfase macro-econômica do Consenso de Washington, como pelo teor institucional do pós-Consenso, radica nas dimensões políticas e sociais. O objetivo de harmonizar as duas gerações de reformas falhou em reconhecer a centralidade política dos atores nos processos nos quais têm parte ativa e ignora a natureza intencional, contingente e imprevisível que consegue imprimir-lhe. 2013-01-12 2020-01-08T19:41:08Z 2020-01-08T19:41:08Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/63 10.18359/ries.63 http://hdl.handle.net/10654/34557 spa http://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/63/1703 /*ref*/Bhagwati, J. (1999). Regionalism and Multilateralism: An Overview. In J. Bhagwati, P Krishna and A. Panagariya (eds.), Trading Blocs: Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Preferential Trade Agreements (pp. 3-32). London: MIT Press. /*ref*/Bhagwati, J. and A. Panagariya (1999). Preferential Trading Areas and Multilateralism-Strangers, Friends or Foes? In J. Bhagwati, P Krishna and A. Panagariya (eds.), Trading Blocs: Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Preferential Trade Agreements (pp. 33-100). London: MIT Press. /*ref*/Bhagwati, J., Greenaway, D. and Panagariya, A. (1998). Trading Preferentially: Theory and Policy. The Economic Journal, 108, 1128-1148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00334 /*ref*/Birdsall, N. and De La Torre, A. (2001). Washington Contentious: Economic Policies for Social Equity in Latin America. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Inter-American Dialogue. /*ref*/Burki, S. J. and Perry, G. (1998). Beyond the Washington Consensus: Institutions Matter. Washington DC: The World Bank. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4282-7 /*ref*/Cuadra-Montiel, H. (2012). Globalization and Re-Commodification in México. In: H. Cuadra-Montiel (ed.), Globalization: Approaches to Diversity (pp. 185-222). Croatia: InTech. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/48514 /*ref*/Cuadra-Montiel, H. (2011). Demystifying Globalization and the State: Preliminary Comments on Re-Commodification, Institutions and Innovation. In: P. Pachura (ed.), The Systemic Dimension of Globalization (pp. 83-108). Croatia: InTech. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/18493 /*ref*/Cuadra-Montiel, H. (2009). Social Change in Mexico: Re-Politicizing the Agenda of Reform. International Review of Sociology - Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 19 (3), 411-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03906700903239063 /*ref*/Cuadra-Montiel, H. (2008). Where Does Mexico Stand? Interpreting NAFTA's Regional Scope and the FTAA Hemispheric Project. Norteamérica, 3 (1), 65-93. /*ref*/Cuadra-Montiel, H. (2007). Critical Realism and the Strategic Relational Approach: Comments on a Non KWNS-SWPR Experience. Journal of Critical Realism, 6 (1), 84-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/jocr.2007.v6i1.84 /*ref*/Dussel Peters, E. (1997). La Economía de la Polarización: Teoría y Evolución del Cambio Estructural de las Manufacturas Mexicanas (1988-1996). México: UNAM and Editorial Jus. /*ref*/Dussel Peters, E. (2000). Polarizing Mexico: The Impact of Liberalization Strategy. London: Lynne Rienner. /*ref*/Fawcett, L. and Hurrell, A. (eds.) (1995). Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press. /*ref*/Foucault, M. (1994). Two Lectures. In M. Kelly (ed.), Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate (pp. 17-46). Cambridge: MIT Press. /*ref*/Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prision. London: Penguin. /*ref*/Foucault, M. (1979). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction (Vol. 1) (Translated by R. Hurley). Harmondsworth: Penguin. /*ref*/Gilpin, R. (2001). Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press. /*ref*/Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), 481-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228311 /*ref*/Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic Institutions as Social Constrictions: A Framework for Analysis. Acta Sociologica, 35 (3), 3-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000169939203500101 /*ref*/Granovetter, M. and Swedberg, R. (eds.) (1992). The Sociology of Economic Life. Colorado: Westview. /*ref*/Hay, C. (1996). Re-stating Social and Political Change. Buckingham: Open University. /*ref*/Hay, C. (2001). The Invocation of External Economic Constraint: A Genealogy of the Concept of Globalization in the Political Economy of the British Labour Party, 1973-2000. The European Legacy, 6 (2), 233-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10848770120031404 /*ref*/Hay, C. (2002). Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. Hampshire: Palgrave. /*ref*/Hay, C. and Marsh, D. (eds.) (2000). Demystifying Globalization. Hampshire: Palgrave. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230554504 /*ref*/Held, D., MCGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. (1999). Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity. /*ref*/Jessop, B. (1990). State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place. Cambridge: Polity. /*ref*/Kuczynski, P. P. and Williamson, J. (eds.) (2003). After the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics. /*ref*/Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and Reality. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203195390 /*ref*/Lawson, T. (2003). Reorienting Economics. London: Routledge. /*ref*/Mansfield, E. D. and Milner, H. V. (eds.) (1997). The Political Economy of Regionalism. New York: Columbia University Press. /*ref*/Mansfield, E. D. and Milner, H. V. (eds.) (1999). The New Wave of Regionalism. International Organization, 53 (3), 589-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/002081899551002 /*ref*/Mckinnon, R. (1973). Money and Capital in Economic Development. Washington DC: Brookings. /*ref*/Mckinnon, R. (1991). The Order of Economic Liberalization: Financial Control in the Transition to a Market Economy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins. /*ref*/Mckinnon, R. (2002). The World Dollar Standard and Emerging Markets. Paper presented at the MaxwellFry Global Finance Lecture. The University of Birmingham. October. /*ref*/North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511808678 /*ref*/Ohmae, K. (1990). The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy. London: Collins. /*ref*/Ohmae, K. (1996). The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies. London: Harper Collins (Special overseas edition). /*ref*/Panagariya, A. (1999). Regionalism in Trade Policy: Essays on Preferential Trading. Singapore: World Scientific. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/4074 /*ref*/Polanyi, K. (1957). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon. /*ref*/Polanyi, K. (1992). The Economy as Instituted Process. In M. Granovetter and R. Swedberg (eds.), The Sociology of Economic Life (pp. 29-51). Colorado: Westview. /*ref*/Polanyi, K. (1996). Our Obsolete Market Mentality: Civilization Must Find a New Thought Pattern. In R. Swedberg (ed.), Economic Sociology (pp. 109-154). Cheltenham: Elgar. /*ref*/Rodrik, D. (1999). The New Global Economy and Developing Countries: Making Openness Work. Washington DC: Overseas Developing Council. /*ref*/Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. /*ref*/Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (Fourth edition). London: Unwin. /*ref*/Schumpeter, J. A. (1996). The Crisis of the Tax State. In R. Swedberg (ed.), Economic Sociology. (pp. 81-114). Cheltenham: Elgar. /*ref*/Serra, J., et al. (1997). Reflections on Regionalism: Report of the Study Group on International Trade. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. /*ref*/Smelser, N. J. and Swedberg, R. (1994). The Sociology Perspective on the Economy. In N. J. Smelser and R. Swedberg (eds), The Handbook of Economic Sociology (pp. 1-26). Princeton: Princeton and Russel Sage Foundation. /*ref*/Stiglitz, J. E. (1998a). More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving Toward the Post-Washington Consensus. The 1998 WIDER Annual Lecture. Helsinki. January. /*ref*/Stiglitz, J. E. (1998b). Redifining the Role of the State: What Should it Do? How Should it Do it? And How Should these Decisions be Made? Paper presented at the 10th Anniversary of MITI Research Institute (Tokyo, Japan), March 1998. /*ref*/Strange, S. (1994). States and Markets (Second edition). London: Pinter. /*ref*/Strange, S. (1996). The Retreat of the State: The Difussion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511559143 /*ref*/Swedberg, R. (1991). Major Traditions in Economic Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 251-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001343 /*ref*/Swedberg, R. (1994). Markets as Social Structures. In N. J. Smelser and R. Swedberg (eds), The Handbook of Economic Sociology (pp. 225-282). Princeton: Princeton and Russel Sage Foundation. /*ref*/Vreeland, J. R. (2003). The IMF and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511615726 /*ref*/Watson, M. (2003). Constructing and Contesting Orthodoxies: General Equilibrium Economics and the Political Discourse of Globalization. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Studies Association. Oregon. February. /*ref*/Williams, D. (1999). Constructing the Economic Space: The World Bank and the Making of the Homo Oeconomicus. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 28 (1), 79-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03058298990280011001 /*ref*/Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington Means by Policy Reform. In J. Williamson (ed.), Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? (pp. 7-20). Washington DC: Institute for International Economics. /*ref*/World Bank (1997). World Development Report 1997. The State in a Changing World. Washington DC: The World Bank and Oxford. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-0-1952-1114-6 /*ref*/World Bank (1998). World Development Report 1998/1999. Knowledge for Development. New York: The World Bank and Oxford. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-0-1952-1118-4 /*ref*/World Bank (1999). World Development Report 1999/2000. Entering the 21st Century. New York: The World Bank and Oxford. /*ref*/World Bank (2000a). Trade Blocs: A World Bank Policy Research Report. New York: The World Bank and Oxford. /*ref*/World Bank (2000b). World Development Report 2000/2001. Attacking Poverty. New York: The World Bank and Oxford. /*ref*/World Bank (2001). World Development Report 2002. Building Institutions for Markets. New York: The World Bank and Oxford. Derechos de autor 2016 De Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 application/pdf Universidad Militar Nueva Granada Revista Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol 8 No 1 (2013): REVISTA DE RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES, ESTRATEGIA Y SEGURIDAD; 21-44 Revista Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2013): REVISTA DE RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES, ESTRATEGIA Y SEGURIDAD; 21-44 1909-7743 1909-3063
score 12,131701