Knowledge management maturity models

The purpose of this article is to compare the 24 Knowledge Management Maturity Models (MMGC) found in the open access academic literature in: JSTOR, Emerald, Scopus, Science Direct, Taylor & Francis, Scielo, Google Scholar, EBSCO Business Source Premier and Engineering Village between 2001 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores Principales: Montañez Carrillo, Luis, Lis Gutiérrez, Jenny Paola
Formato: Artículo (Article)
Lenguaje:Español (Spanish)
Publicado: Universidad Militar Nueva Granada 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10654/34010
Descripción
Sumario:The purpose of this article is to compare the 24 Knowledge Management Maturity Models (MMGC) found in the open access academic literature in: JSTOR, Emerald, Scopus, Science Direct, Taylor & Francis, Scielo, Google Scholar, EBSCO Business Source Premier and Engineering Village between 2001 and 2016. The comparison criteria used corresponded to those proposed by Martínez (2015). It was identified that the most appropriate MMGC for the GC´s maturity diagnosis execution is the Teah, Pee & Kankanhalli´s (2006) GC maturity general model.