Innovation Research in Management and STEM for Sustainability in Developing Countries Insights from Bibliometrics in the Global South

La investigación en innovación para la sostenibilidad en países en vías de desarrollo (i. e., el Sur global: sg) es crucial para la agenda de desarrollo global. Investigaciones previas han contribuido en establecer la relación entre sostenibilidad y administración señalando la desfragmentación entre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores Principales: Cortés-Sánchez, Julián David, Bohle Carbonell, Katerina, Guix, Mireia
Formato: Documento de trabajo (Working Paper)
Lenguaje:Inglés (English)
Publicado: Universidad del Rosario 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28225
id ir-10336-28225
recordtype dspace
institution EdocUR - Universidad del Rosario
collection DSpace
language Inglés (English)
topic Innovación
Sostenibilidad
Administración
Stem
Sur global
Países en vías de desarrollo
Bibliometría
Macroeconomía & temas relacionados
Desarrollo sostenible - Investigaciones
Investigación científica
Administración - Innovaciones tecnológicas
Bibliometría
Innovation
Sustainability
Management
Stem
Global south
Developing countries
Bibliometrics
spellingShingle Innovación
Sostenibilidad
Administración
Stem
Sur global
Países en vías de desarrollo
Bibliometría
Macroeconomía & temas relacionados
Desarrollo sostenible - Investigaciones
Investigación científica
Administración - Innovaciones tecnológicas
Bibliometría
Innovation
Sustainability
Management
Stem
Global south
Developing countries
Bibliometrics
Cortés-Sánchez, Julián David
Bohle Carbonell, Katerina
Guix, Mireia
Innovation Research in Management and STEM for Sustainability in Developing Countries Insights from Bibliometrics in the Global South
description La investigación en innovación para la sostenibilidad en países en vías de desarrollo (i. e., el Sur global: sg) es crucial para la agenda de desarrollo global. Investigaciones previas han contribuido en establecer la relación entre sostenibilidad y administración señalando la desfragmentación entre áreas de investigación e industrias. No obstante, poco se sabe sobre el rol integrativo de la innovación en administración y stem (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) para la sostenibilidad en el sg. Este estudio presenta un estudio bibliométrico exploratorio sobre la producción, impacto y estructura de la investigación en innovación y administración y stem para la sostenibilidad en el sg con base en una muestra de más de 14, 000 documentos indexados en Scopus. China es el líder en producción e impacto, además de establecer la agenda de investigación según sus prioridades. Las áreas de investigación en el sg son periféricas a los Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio y la colaboración Sur-Norte es más frecuente que la Sur-Sur.
format Documento de trabajo (Working Paper)
author Cortés-Sánchez, Julián David
Bohle Carbonell, Katerina
Guix, Mireia
author_facet Cortés-Sánchez, Julián David
Bohle Carbonell, Katerina
Guix, Mireia
author_sort Cortés-Sánchez, Julián David
title Innovation Research in Management and STEM for Sustainability in Developing Countries Insights from Bibliometrics in the Global South
title_short Innovation Research in Management and STEM for Sustainability in Developing Countries Insights from Bibliometrics in the Global South
title_full Innovation Research in Management and STEM for Sustainability in Developing Countries Insights from Bibliometrics in the Global South
title_fullStr Innovation Research in Management and STEM for Sustainability in Developing Countries Insights from Bibliometrics in the Global South
title_full_unstemmed Innovation Research in Management and STEM for Sustainability in Developing Countries Insights from Bibliometrics in the Global South
title_sort innovation research in management and stem for sustainability in developing countries insights from bibliometrics in the global south
publisher Universidad del Rosario
publishDate 2020
url https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28225
_version_ 1684235511194976256
spelling ir-10336-282252020-11-22T08:04:21Z Innovation Research in Management and STEM for Sustainability in Developing Countries Insights from Bibliometrics in the Global South Investigación sobre innovación en gestión y STEM para la sostenibilidad en países en desarrollo Perspectivas de la bibliometría en el Sur global Cortés-Sánchez, Julián David Bohle Carbonell, Katerina Guix, Mireia Innovación Sostenibilidad Administración Stem Sur global Países en vías de desarrollo Bibliometría Macroeconomía & temas relacionados Desarrollo sostenible - Investigaciones Investigación científica Administración - Innovaciones tecnológicas Bibliometría Innovation Sustainability Management Stem Global south Developing countries Bibliometrics La investigación en innovación para la sostenibilidad en países en vías de desarrollo (i. e., el Sur global: sg) es crucial para la agenda de desarrollo global. Investigaciones previas han contribuido en establecer la relación entre sostenibilidad y administración señalando la desfragmentación entre áreas de investigación e industrias. No obstante, poco se sabe sobre el rol integrativo de la innovación en administración y stem (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) para la sostenibilidad en el sg. Este estudio presenta un estudio bibliométrico exploratorio sobre la producción, impacto y estructura de la investigación en innovación y administración y stem para la sostenibilidad en el sg con base en una muestra de más de 14, 000 documentos indexados en Scopus. China es el líder en producción e impacto, además de establecer la agenda de investigación según sus prioridades. Las áreas de investigación en el sg son periféricas a los Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio y la colaboración Sur-Norte es más frecuente que la Sur-Sur. Research on innovation for sustainability in developing countries (i. e., the Global South: gs) is crucial for the global development agenda. Previous research has contributed to establishing the relationship between sustainability and management and outlining fragmented insights on several research topics and industries. However, little is known on the integrative role of innovation in management and stem (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) for sustainability in the gs. Here, we present an exploratory bibliometric outlook on the output, impact, and structure of the research innovation in management and stem for sustainability in the gs based on a sample of 14,000+ documents indexed in Scopus. China is leading the overall output and impact and is setting the research agenda by its priorities. Research topics in the gs are rather peripherical to the Sustainable Development Goals and South-North collaboration is more frequent than South-South. 2020-08 2020-08-21T23:02:35Z info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2463-1892 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28225 eng Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess application/pdf Universidad del Rosario reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR instname:Universidad del Rosario Adams, J. (2012). The rise of research networks. Nature, 490(7420), 335-336. https://doi.org/10.1038/490335a Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 Arunachalam, S., & Doss, M. J. (2000). Mapping international collaboration in science in Asia through co-authorship analysis. Current Science, 79(5), 621-628. Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323- 1339. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578 Bettencourt, L. M. A., & Kaur, J. (2011). Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(49), 19540. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102712108 Ceretta, G. F., Dos Reis, D. R., & Da Rocha, A. C. (2016). Innovation and business models: a bibliometric study of scientific production on Web of Science database. Gestao e Producao, 23(2), 433-444. Scopus. https:// doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X1461-14 Cortés-Sánchez, J. D. (2019). Innovation in Latin America through the lens of bibliometrics: crammed and fading away. Scientometrics, 121(2), 869-895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03201-0 De Carvalho, G. D. G., Cruz, J. A. W., De Carvalho, H. G., Duclós, L. C., & De Fátima Stankowitz, R. (2017). Innovativeness measures: a bibliometric review and a classification proposal. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(1), 81-101. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/ IJIS-10-2016-0038 Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the eu framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293-305. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.008 Durieux, V., & Gevenois, P. A. (2010). Bibliometric indicators: quality measurements of scientific publication. Radiology, 255(2), 342-351. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090626 Dyachenko, E. L. (2014). Internationalization of academic journals: is there still a gap between social and natural sciences? Scientometrics, 101(1), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1357-9 Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1132-1153. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008 Fairthorne, R. (2005). Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford–Zipf– Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction. Journal of Documentation, 61(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510585179 Finardi, U. (2015). Scientific collaboration between brics countries. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1139-1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1490-5 Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199-214. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010561321723 Glänzel, Wolfgang, & Schubert, A. (2005). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: the use of publication and Patent Statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 257-276). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12 Glavič, P., & Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(18), 1875-1885. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.12.006 Guan, J., & He, Y. (2007). Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science. Technology linkages. Scientometrics, 72(3), 403-425. Scopus. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-007-1741-1 Huang, F. (2018). Low quality studies belie hype about research boom in China. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ low-quality-studies-belie-hype-about-research-boom-in-china/ Huang, L., Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., Zhu, D., & Porter, A. L. (2014). Four dimensional Science and Technology planning: a new approach based on bibliometrics and technology roadmapping. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2012.09.010 Inönü, E. (2003). The influence of cultural factors on scientific production. Scientometrics, 56(1), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021906925642 International Telecommunications Union (itu). (2018). Country classifications. https://www.itu.int/en/itu-d/Statistics/Pages/definitions/ regions.aspx Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2011). The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. Special Issue: The Role of Firms in Tax Systems, 95(9), 1168-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005 Jentsch, B., & Pilley, C. (2003). Research relationships between the South and the North: Cinderella and the ugly sisters? Social Science & Medicine, 57(10), 1957-1967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277- 9536(03)00060-1 Jia, Q., Wei, L., & Li, X. (2019). Visualizing sustainability research in business and management (1990-2019) and emerging topics: a large-scale bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 11(20), 5596. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su11205596 Kajikawa, Y. (2008). Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 3(2), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625- 008-0053-1 Kajikawa, Y., Ohno, J., Takeda, Y., Matsushima, K., & Komiyama, H. (2007). Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: an analysis of the citation network. Sustainability Science, 2(2), 221. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11625-007-0027-8 King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1038/430311a Kozma, C., & Calero-Medina, C. (2019). The role of South African researchers in intercontinental collaboration. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1293-1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03230-9 Lazzarotti, F., Dalfovo, M. S., & Hoffmann, V. E. (2011). A bibliometric study of innovation based on schumpeter. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 6(4), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.4067/ S0718-27242011000400010 Li, N., Chen, K., & Kou, M. (2017). Technology foresight in China: academic studies, governmental practices and policy applications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 246-255. Scopus. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.010 Li, X., Zhou, Y., Xue, L., & Huang, L. (2015). Integrating bibliometrics and roadmapping methods: a case of dye-sensitized solar cell technologybased industry in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 97, 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.007 Lisée, C., Larivière, V., & Archambault, É. (2008). Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1776-1784. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20888 Lopes, A. P. V. B. V., & De Carvalho, M. M. (2012). The evolution of the literature on innovation in cooperative relationships: a bibliometric study for the last two decades. Gestao e Producao, 19(1), 203-217. Scopus. Manjarrez, C. C. A., Pico, J. A. C., & Díaz, P. A. (2016). Industry interactions in innovation systems: a bibliometric study. Latin American Business Review, 17(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526. 2016.1209036 Merigó, J. M., Cancino, C. A., Coronado, F., & Urbano, D. (2016). Academic research in innovation: a country analysis. Scientometrics, 108(2), 559-593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1984-4 Michels, C., & Fu, J.-Y. (2014). Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of science. Scientometrics, 100(2), 307-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1309-4 Nakamura, M., Pendlebury, D., Schnell, J., & Szomszor, M. (2019). Navigating the structure of research on sustainable development goals. Web of Science Group. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/campaigns/ sustainable-development-goals/ National Science Foundation. (2014). nsf approved fields of study. https:// www.btaa.org/docs/default-source/diversity/nsf-approved-fields-ofstudy. pdf?sfvrsn=1bc446f3_2 Ortiz-Ospina, E., Beltekian, D., & Roser, M. (2018). Trade and globalization. Our world in data. https://ourworldindata.org/trade-and-globalization Padilla-Ospina, A. M., Medina-Vásquez, J. E., & Rivera-Godoy, J. A. (2018). Financing innovation: a bibliometric analysis of the field. Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship, 23(1), 63-102. Scopus. https:// doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2018.1448678 Pouris, A., & Pouris, A. (2009). The state of science and technology in Africa (2000-2004): a scientometric assessment. Scientometrics, 79(2), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0419-x Prathap, G. (2017). Scientific wealth and inequality within nations. Scientometrics, 113(2), 923-928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2511-y Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349. Qiu, J.-P., Dong, K., & Yu, H.-Q. (2014). Comparative study on structure and correlation among author co-occurrence networks in bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1345-1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192- 014-1315-6 SCImago. (2018). scimago Journal Ranking. https://www.scimagojr.com/ Scopus. (2015). Breaking the 1996 barrier: Scopus adds nearly 4 million pre-1996 articles and more than 83 million references. https://blog. scopus.com/posts/breaking-the-1996-barrier-scopus-adds-nearly- 4-million-pre-1996-articles-and-more-than-83 Scopus. (2018). Search. https://www.scopus.com/ Sedighi, M. (2016). Application of word co-occurrence analysis method in mapping of the scientific fields (case study: The field of Informetrics). Library Review, 65(1/2), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-07-2015- 0075 Silveira, F. F., & Zilber, S. N. (2017). Is social innovation about innovation? A bibliometric study identifying the main authors, citations and co-citations over 20 years. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 21(6), 459-484. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/ asi.4630240406 Tanco, M., Escuder, M., Heckmann, G., Jurburg, D., & Velazquez, J. (2018). Supply chain management in Latin America: current research and future directions. Supply Chain Management, 23(5), 412-430. Scopus. https:// doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2017-0236 The World Bank. (2018). World Bank open data | Data. https://data.worldbank. org/ Tollefson, J. (2018). China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles. Nature, 553, 390. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-00927-4 Uddin, A., Singh, V. K., Pinto, D., & Olmos, I. (2015). Scientometric mapping of computer science research in Mexico. Scientometrics, 105(1), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1654-y undp. (2019). Southern development solutions for the sustainable development goals. undp. https://www.latinamerica.undp.org/content/rblac/en/home/ library/poverty/southern-development-solutions-for-the-sustainabledevelopment- g.html United Nations. (2018). Goal 9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation. https:// sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg9 United Nations. (2019a). Special edition: Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations. https://undocs.org/ pdf?symbol=en/E/2019/68 United Nations. (2019b). What is “South-South cooperation” and why does it matter? un desa | United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/intergovernmental- coordination/south-south-cooperation-2019.html Usman, M. K., & Ewulum, O. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of Nigeria’s Library and Information Sciences literature: a study of journal of applied information science and technology. collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 13(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 9737766.2018.1541042 Van Arensbergen, P., Van der Weijden, I., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2012). Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon? Scientometrics, 93(3), 857-868. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192- 012-0712-y Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 Walker, R., Barros, B., Conejo, R., Neumann, K., & Telefont, M. (2015). Personal attributes of authors and reviewers, social bias and the outcomes of peer review: a case study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research, 4(21). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6012.2 Wikipedia. (2015). List of countries by regional classification. https://meta. wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_regional_classification World Economic Forum. (2019). Future technologies will drive industry 4.0 | World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/ future-technologies-will-drive-industry-4-0/ World Intellectual Property Organization. (2019). Patent Cooperation Treaty Yearly Review 2019. WIPO. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099 Zavale, N. C., & Langa, P. V. (2018). University-industry linkages’ literature on Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic literature review and bibliometric account. Scientometrics, 116(1), 1-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192- 018-2760-4 Zhu, J., & Hua, W. (2017). Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 110(2), 893-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016- 2187-8 Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
score 12,131701