Animal-assisted therapy in adults: A systematic review
Animal-assisted therapies have become widespread with programs targeting a variety of pathologies and populations. Despite its popularity, it is unclear if this therapy is useful. The aim of this systematic review is to establish the efficacy of Animal assisted therapies in the management of dementi...
Autores Principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo (Article) |
Lenguaje: | Inglés (English) |
Publicado: |
Churchill Livingstone
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23757 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.06.011 |
id |
ir-10336-23757 |
---|---|
recordtype |
dspace |
spelling |
ir-10336-237572022-05-02T12:37:17Z Animal-assisted therapy in adults: A systematic review Charry-Sánchez J.D. Pradilla I. Talero-Gutiérrez, Claudia Adult Animal assisted therapy Dementia Depression Female Human Adult Animal assisted therapy Dementia Depression Female Humans Animal assisted therapy Dementia Depression Multiple sclerosis Ptsd Spinal cord injury Animal-assisted therapies have become widespread with programs targeting a variety of pathologies and populations. Despite its popularity, it is unclear if this therapy is useful. The aim of this systematic review is to establish the efficacy of Animal assisted therapies in the management of dementia, depression and other conditions in adult population. A search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, ScienceDirect, and Taylor and Francis, OpenGrey, GreyLiteratureReport, ProQuest, and DIALNET. No language or study type filters were applied. Conditions studied included depression, dementia, multiple sclerosis, PTSD, stroke, spinal cord injury, and schizophrenia. Only articles published after the year 2000 using therapies with significant animal involvement were included. 23 articles and dissertations met inclusion criteria. Overall quality was low. The degree of animal interaction significantly influenced outcomes. Results are generally favorable, but more thorough and standardized research should be done to strengthen the existing evidence. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd 2018 2020-05-26T00:05:08Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 17443881 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23757 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.06.011 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess application/pdf Churchill Livingstone instname:Universidad del Rosario |
institution |
EdocUR - Universidad del Rosario |
collection |
DSpace |
language |
Inglés (English) |
topic |
Adult Animal assisted therapy Dementia Depression Female Human Adult Animal assisted therapy Dementia Depression Female Humans Animal assisted therapy Dementia Depression Multiple sclerosis Ptsd Spinal cord injury |
spellingShingle |
Adult Animal assisted therapy Dementia Depression Female Human Adult Animal assisted therapy Dementia Depression Female Humans Animal assisted therapy Dementia Depression Multiple sclerosis Ptsd Spinal cord injury Charry-Sánchez J.D. Pradilla I. Talero-Gutiérrez, Claudia Animal-assisted therapy in adults: A systematic review |
description |
Animal-assisted therapies have become widespread with programs targeting a variety of pathologies and populations. Despite its popularity, it is unclear if this therapy is useful. The aim of this systematic review is to establish the efficacy of Animal assisted therapies in the management of dementia, depression and other conditions in adult population. A search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, ScienceDirect, and Taylor and Francis, OpenGrey, GreyLiteratureReport, ProQuest, and DIALNET. No language or study type filters were applied. Conditions studied included depression, dementia, multiple sclerosis, PTSD, stroke, spinal cord injury, and schizophrenia. Only articles published after the year 2000 using therapies with significant animal involvement were included. 23 articles and dissertations met inclusion criteria. Overall quality was low. The degree of animal interaction significantly influenced outcomes. Results are generally favorable, but more thorough and standardized research should be done to strengthen the existing evidence. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd |
format |
Artículo (Article) |
author |
Charry-Sánchez J.D. Pradilla I. Talero-Gutiérrez, Claudia |
author_facet |
Charry-Sánchez J.D. Pradilla I. Talero-Gutiérrez, Claudia |
author_sort |
Charry-Sánchez J.D. |
title |
Animal-assisted therapy in adults: A systematic review |
title_short |
Animal-assisted therapy in adults: A systematic review |
title_full |
Animal-assisted therapy in adults: A systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Animal-assisted therapy in adults: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Animal-assisted therapy in adults: A systematic review |
title_sort |
animal-assisted therapy in adults: a systematic review |
publisher |
Churchill Livingstone |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23757 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.06.011 |
_version_ |
1740172988305637376 |
score |
12,131701 |