Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion
Introduction: Human gait is the highest point in a person's functional independence; therefore, its importance as a movement pattern has led to the development of measuring tools. Objective: To assess the concordance between 2 measuring tools: computerised gait analysis (CGA) and physical exami...
Autores Principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo (Article) |
Lenguaje: | Inglés (English) |
Publicado: |
Ediciones Doyma, S.L.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22918 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rh.2017.11.002 |
id |
ir-10336-22918 |
---|---|
recordtype |
dspace |
spelling |
ir-10336-229182022-05-02T12:37:20Z Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion Concordancia entre el análisis computarizado de la marcha y el examen físico en pacientes con anteversión femoral aumentada sin alteraciones neurológicas de la Pava I.C. Duplat J.L. Bone anteversion Femur Gait analysis Physical examination Introduction: Human gait is the highest point in a person's functional independence; therefore, its importance as a movement pattern has led to the development of measuring tools. Objective: To assess the concordance between 2 measuring tools: computerised gait analysis (CGA) and physical examination (PE) in patients with increased femoral anteversion without neurological alterations. Methods: We conducted an observational analytic study of concordance. Data were obtained retrospectively from 2010 to 2014 in the gait analysis laboratory of the Roosevelt Children's Orthopaedics Institute through a single application of CGA and PE. Results: There were evident alterations in the PE because, at the hip, the internal-external rotation range decreases in the stance and swing phases. In the knee, there was a decrease in the flexion-extension range during the swing phase and in the ankle there was also a decrease in the dorsiflexion-plantarflexion range in the stance and swing phases. Conclusion: This study found that there was no concordance between PE and CGA. Therefore, these tests are complementary and provide information for a differential approach in clinical decision-making. © 2017 Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SERMEF 2018 2020-05-25T23:58:43Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 487120 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22918 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rh.2017.11.002 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess application/pdf Ediciones Doyma, S.L. instname:Universidad del Rosario |
institution |
EdocUR - Universidad del Rosario |
collection |
DSpace |
language |
Inglés (English) |
topic |
Bone anteversion Femur Gait analysis Physical examination |
spellingShingle |
Bone anteversion Femur Gait analysis Physical examination de la Pava I.C. Duplat J.L. Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion |
description |
Introduction: Human gait is the highest point in a person's functional independence; therefore, its importance as a movement pattern has led to the development of measuring tools. Objective: To assess the concordance between 2 measuring tools: computerised gait analysis (CGA) and physical examination (PE) in patients with increased femoral anteversion without neurological alterations. Methods: We conducted an observational analytic study of concordance. Data were obtained retrospectively from 2010 to 2014 in the gait analysis laboratory of the Roosevelt Children's Orthopaedics Institute through a single application of CGA and PE. Results: There were evident alterations in the PE because, at the hip, the internal-external rotation range decreases in the stance and swing phases. In the knee, there was a decrease in the flexion-extension range during the swing phase and in the ankle there was also a decrease in the dorsiflexion-plantarflexion range in the stance and swing phases. Conclusion: This study found that there was no concordance between PE and CGA. Therefore, these tests are complementary and provide information for a differential approach in clinical decision-making. © 2017 Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SERMEF |
format |
Artículo (Article) |
author |
de la Pava I.C. Duplat J.L. |
author_facet |
de la Pava I.C. Duplat J.L. |
author_sort |
de la Pava I.C. |
title |
Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion |
title_short |
Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion |
title_full |
Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion |
title_fullStr |
Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion |
title_full_unstemmed |
Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion |
title_sort |
concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion |
publisher |
Ediciones Doyma, S.L. |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22918 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rh.2017.11.002 |
_version_ |
1740172214392586240 |
score |
12,131701 |