Vista Equipo: Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?

Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?

Words with many orthographic neighbors elicit a larger N400 than words with few orthographic neighbors. This has been interpreted as stronger overall semantic activation due to orthographic neighbors activating their semantic representations. To investigate this claim, we manipulated the number of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores Principales:	Müller, Oliver, Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni, Carreiras, Manuel
Formato:	Artículo (Article)
Lenguaje:	Inglés (English)
Publicado:	Blackwell Publishing Inc. 2010
Materias:	Association ERP Language Orthographic neighbors Semantic representation Visual word recognition
Acceso en línea:	https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22907 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00960.x

id	ir-10336-22907
recordtype	dspace
spelling	ir-10336-229072022-05-02T12:37:20Z Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different? Müller, Oliver Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni Carreiras, Manuel Association ERP Language Orthographic neighbors Semantic representation Visual word recognition Words with many orthographic neighbors elicit a larger N400 than words with few orthographic neighbors. This has been interpreted as stronger overall semantic activation due to orthographic neighbors activating their semantic representations. To investigate this claim, we manipulated the number of associates of words (NoA), a variable directly affecting overall semantic activation, and compared this to the ERP effect of the number of orthographic neighbors (N) in a lexical decision task. Words with high NoA and with high N produced a very similar increase of the N400. In addition, a higher N increased the amplitude of the Late Positive Complex. The common N400 effect suggests that N affects semantic activation, like NoA does. The late positive effect specific to N could occur because words with few orthographic neighbors initially elicit little activity in the orthographic system, thereby resembling nonwords, which leads to distinct processing. © 2010 Society for Psychophysiological Research. 2010 2020-05-25T23:58:40Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 00485772 14698986 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22907 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00960.x eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess application/pdf Blackwell Publishing Inc. instname:Universidad del Rosario
institution	EdocUR - Universidad del Rosario
collection	DSpace
language	Inglés (English)
topic	Association ERP Language Orthographic neighbors Semantic representation Visual word recognition
spellingShingle	Association ERP Language Orthographic neighbors Semantic representation Visual word recognition Müller, Oliver Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni Carreiras, Manuel Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?
description	Words with many orthographic neighbors elicit a larger N400 than words with few orthographic neighbors. This has been interpreted as stronger overall semantic activation due to orthographic neighbors activating their semantic representations. To investigate this claim, we manipulated the number of associates of words (NoA), a variable directly affecting overall semantic activation, and compared this to the ERP effect of the number of orthographic neighbors (N) in a lexical decision task. Words with high NoA and with high N produced a very similar increase of the N400. In addition, a higher N increased the amplitude of the Late Positive Complex. The common N400 effect suggests that N affects semantic activation, like NoA does. The late positive effect specific to N could occur because words with few orthographic neighbors initially elicit little activity in the orthographic system, thereby resembling nonwords, which leads to distinct processing. © 2010 Society for Psychophysiological Research.
format	Artículo (Article)
author	Müller, Oliver Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni Carreiras, Manuel
author_facet	Müller, Oliver Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni Carreiras, Manuel
author_sort	Müller, Oliver
title	Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?
title_short	Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?
title_full	Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?
title_fullStr	Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?
title_full_unstemmed	Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?
title_sort	orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: what is shared, what is different?
publisher	Blackwell Publishing Inc.
publishDate	2010
url	https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22907 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00960.x
_version_	1740172522212556800
score	12,131701

Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?

Ejemplares similares