Latin American and Caribbean consensus on noninvasive central nervous system neuromodulation for chronic pain management (LAC 2 -NIN-CP)

Introduction: Chronic pain (CP) is highly prevalent and generally undertreated health condition. Noninvasive brain stimulation may contribute to decrease pain intensity and influence other aspects related to CP. Objective: To provide consensus-based recommendations for the use of noninvasive brain s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores Principales: Baptista, Abrahão Fontes, Fernandes, Ana Mércia B L, Sá, Katia Nunes, Okano, Alexandre Hideki, Brunoni, André Russowsky, Lara-Solares, Argelia, Jreige Iskandar, Aziza, Guerrero, Carlos, Amescua-García, César, Kraychete, Durval Campos, Caparelli-Daquer, Egas, Atencio, Elias, Piedimonte, Fabián, Colimon, Frantz, Hazime, Fuad Ahmed, Garcia, João Batista S, Cantisani, José Alberto Flores, Karina do Monte-Silva, Kátia, Lemos Correia, Luis Claudio, Gallegos, Manuel Sempértegui, Marcolin, Marco Antonio, Ricco, María Antonieta, Cook, María Berenguel, Bonilla, Patricia, Schestatsky, Pedro, Galhardoni, Ricardo, Silva, Valquíria, Delgado Barrera, William, Caumo, Wolnei, Bouhassira, Didier, Chipchase, Lucy S, Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal, Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen, de Andrade, Daniel Ciampi, Hernandez-Castro, John-Jairo
Formato: Objeto de conferencia (Conference Object)
Lenguaje:Inglés (English)
Publicado: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22745
https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000692
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: Chronic pain (CP) is highly prevalent and generally undertreated health condition. Noninvasive brain stimulation may contribute to decrease pain intensity and influence other aspects related to CP. Objective: To provide consensus-based recommendations for the use of noninvasive brain stimulation in clinical practice. Methods: Systematic review of the literature searching for randomized clinical trials followed by consensus panel. Recommendations also involved a cost-estimation study. Results: The systematic review wielded 24 transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and 22 repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) studies. The following recommendations were provided: (1) Level A for anodal tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1) in fibromyalgia, and level B for peripheral neuropathic pain, abdominal pain, and migraine; bifrontal (F3/F4) tDCS and M1 high-definition (HD)-tDCS for fibromyalgia; Oz/Cz tDCS for migraine and for secondary benefits such as improvement in quality of life, decrease in anxiety, and increase in pressure pain threshold; (2) level A recommendation for high-frequency (HF) rTMS over M1 for fibromyalgia and neuropathic pain, and level B for myofascial or musculoskeletal pain, complex regional pain syndrome, and migraine; (3) level A recommendation against the use of anodal M1 tDCS for low back pain; and (4) level B recommendation against the use of HF rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the control of pain. Conclusion: Transcranial DCS and rTMS are recommended techniques to be used in the control of CP conditions, with low to moderate analgesic effects, and no severe adverse events. These recommendations are based on a systematic review of the literature and a consensus made by experts in the field. Readers should use it as part of the resources available to decision-making. Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-SA).