The regulation of health care providers' payments when horizontal and vertical differentiation matter

This paper analyzes the regulation of payment schemes for health care providers competing in both quality and product differentiation of their services. The regulator uses two instruments: a prospective payment per patient and a cost reimbursement rate. When the regulator can only use a prospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores Principales: Bardey D., Canta C., Lozachmeur J.-M.
Formato: Artículo (Article)
Lenguaje:Inglés (English)
Publicado: 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22362
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.04.002
id ir-10336-22362
recordtype dspace
spelling ir-10336-223622022-05-02T12:37:20Z The regulation of health care providers' payments when horizontal and vertical differentiation matter Bardey D. Canta C. Lozachmeur J.-M. Differentiation Health care Health services Regulatory framework Article Economic aspect Government regulation Health care cost Health care quality Health insurance Patient transport Prospective payment Reimbursement Remuneration Resource allocation Social welfare Europe Government regulation Health care costs Health personnel Humans Prospective payment system Quality of health care Reimbursement mechanisms Health care Horizontal and vertical differentiation Mixed payment schemes Regulation economic Models This paper analyzes the regulation of payment schemes for health care providers competing in both quality and product differentiation of their services. The regulator uses two instruments: a prospective payment per patient and a cost reimbursement rate. When the regulator can only use a prospective payment, the optimal price involves a trade-off between the level of quality provision and the level of horizontal differentiation. If this pure prospective payment leads to underprovision of quality and overdifferentiation, a mixed reimbursement scheme allows the regulator to improve the allocation efficiency. This is true for a relatively low level of patients' transportation costs. We also show that if the regulator cannot commit to the level of the cost reimbursement rate, the resulting allocation can dominate the one with full commitment. This occurs when the transportation cost is low or high enough, and the full commitment solution either implies full or zero cost reimbursement. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. 2012 2020-05-25T23:56:13Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 1676296 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22362 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.04.002 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess application/pdf instname:Universidad del Rosario
institution EdocUR - Universidad del Rosario
collection DSpace
language Inglés (English)
topic Differentiation
Health care
Health services
Regulatory framework
Article
Economic aspect
Government regulation
Health care cost
Health care quality
Health insurance
Patient transport
Prospective payment
Reimbursement
Remuneration
Resource allocation
Social welfare
Europe
Government regulation
Health care costs
Health personnel
Humans
Prospective payment system
Quality of health care
Reimbursement mechanisms
Health care
Horizontal and vertical differentiation
Mixed payment schemes
Regulation
economic
Models
spellingShingle Differentiation
Health care
Health services
Regulatory framework
Article
Economic aspect
Government regulation
Health care cost
Health care quality
Health insurance
Patient transport
Prospective payment
Reimbursement
Remuneration
Resource allocation
Social welfare
Europe
Government regulation
Health care costs
Health personnel
Humans
Prospective payment system
Quality of health care
Reimbursement mechanisms
Health care
Horizontal and vertical differentiation
Mixed payment schemes
Regulation
economic
Models
Bardey D.
Canta C.
Lozachmeur J.-M.
The regulation of health care providers' payments when horizontal and vertical differentiation matter
description This paper analyzes the regulation of payment schemes for health care providers competing in both quality and product differentiation of their services. The regulator uses two instruments: a prospective payment per patient and a cost reimbursement rate. When the regulator can only use a prospective payment, the optimal price involves a trade-off between the level of quality provision and the level of horizontal differentiation. If this pure prospective payment leads to underprovision of quality and overdifferentiation, a mixed reimbursement scheme allows the regulator to improve the allocation efficiency. This is true for a relatively low level of patients' transportation costs. We also show that if the regulator cannot commit to the level of the cost reimbursement rate, the resulting allocation can dominate the one with full commitment. This occurs when the transportation cost is low or high enough, and the full commitment solution either implies full or zero cost reimbursement. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.
format Artículo (Article)
author Bardey D.
Canta C.
Lozachmeur J.-M.
author_facet Bardey D.
Canta C.
Lozachmeur J.-M.
author_sort Bardey D.
title The regulation of health care providers' payments when horizontal and vertical differentiation matter
title_short The regulation of health care providers' payments when horizontal and vertical differentiation matter
title_full The regulation of health care providers' payments when horizontal and vertical differentiation matter
title_fullStr The regulation of health care providers' payments when horizontal and vertical differentiation matter
title_full_unstemmed The regulation of health care providers' payments when horizontal and vertical differentiation matter
title_sort regulation of health care providers' payments when horizontal and vertical differentiation matter
publishDate 2012
url https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22362
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.04.002
_version_ 1740172520662761472
score 12,131701